Case study
Pasteurizer water use reduced from 28.0 to 5.5 m³/day
WaterBreweries & BeverageFood & Beverage Processing
Pasteurizer water use fell from 28.0 to 5.5 m³/day, producing approximately $38,400 in annual savings through operational changes alone.
Carlsberg Canada
Carlsberg Canada
How it went.
Every study on this site runs the same four beats, in the same order.
01
Alert
One monthly water bill, one big number, and almost no visibility into where that water was going.
02
Cost
$38,400 per year. Can Line Pasteurizer 2: 28.0 m³/day → 5.5 m³/day with no process changes.
03
Fix
Flow meters on the pasteurizer water circuit · Existing Neptune Mach 10 meters connected, not replaced · Existing Endress+Hauser and IFM meters connected · PLC data brought in via Scadametrics signalizers
04
Restored
5.5 m³/day, on a schedule informed entirely by the data
In full.
The problem
“They came to us with a specific challenge: one monthly water bill, one big number, almost no visibility into where that water was going.”
A brewery’s water is not one thing. It is process water, pasteurizer water, CIP, washdown and packaging, and until it is metered separately the monthly invoice cannot tell anyone which of the five moved. The quote above is the whole problem in one sentence, and the first week of meter data is what answered it.
What we installed
Flow meters on the pasteurizer water circuit, plus connection of the meters Carlsberg already owned (Neptune Mach 10, Endress+Hauser, IFM) and PLC data via Scadametrics signalizers. Nothing was ripped out.
What the data showed
“Within the first few weeks: the pasteurizer was consuming water outside of production hours. When the line was idle — between runs, overnight — water was still flowing.”
The fix
“The fix was a scheduling adjustment. No new equipment. No capital expenditure. Just a change informed entirely by data.”
The number
28.0 → 5.5 m³/day. $38,400 annualized. Source: NB Power RFP 0770-25-S510, Reference 3.
Also true
Carlsberg’s work received recognition in the AIM2Flourish global sustainability programme, and Carlsberg Group’s European ESG team cited the site as a model for potential global replication.
Closing
“You can’t fix what you can’t see.”
What the data looked like.
Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.
| Interval | Before · 28.0 m³/day (L/min) | After · 5.5 m³/day (L/min) |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | 14 | 0 |
| 00:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 01:00 | 16 | 1 |
| 01:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 02:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 02:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 03:00 | 16 | 0 |
| 03:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 04:00 | 15 | 1 |
| 04:30 | 16 | 0 |
| 05:00 | 14 | 0 |
| 05:30 | 15 | 1 |
| 06:00 | 14 | 0 |
| 06:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 07:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 07:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 08:00 | 33 | 14 |
| 08:30 | 33 | 14 |
| 09:00 | 33 | 15 |
| 09:30 | 34 | 15 |
| 10:00 | 33 | 14 |
| 10:30 | 34 | 15 |
| 11:00 | 14 | 0 |
| 11:30 | 14 | 0 |
| 12:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 12:30 | 16 | 1 |
| 13:00 | 33 | 14 |
| 13:30 | 32 | 14 |
| 14:00 | 32 | 15 |
| 14:30 | 33 | 14 |
| 15:00 | 33 | 15 |
| 15:30 | 33 | 15 |
| 16:00 | 16 | 1 |
| 16:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 17:00 | 14 | 0 |
| 17:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 18:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 18:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 19:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 19:30 | 16 | 0 |
| 20:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 20:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 21:00 | 15 | 1 |
| 21:30 | 16 | 0 |
| 22:00 | 15 | 0 |
| 22:30 | 15 | 0 |
| 23:00 | 16 | 0 |
| 23:30 | 15 | 0 |
| Before | 28.0 m³/day, with water flowing between runs and overnight |
|---|---|
| After | 5.5 m³/day, on a schedule informed entirely by the data |
| From | To | Value (L/min) |
|---|---|---|
| Municipal supply | Brewhouse | 41 |
| Municipal supply | CIP | 28 |
| Municipal supply | Pasteurizer | 19 |
| Municipal supply | Packaging washdown | 17 |
| Municipal supply | Boiler and tower | 12 |
| Recovered loop | CIP | 9 |
| Recovered loop | Packaging washdown | 6 |
The published totals are the figures in the proof register, with their sources. The interval shape is a representative reconstruction and is flagged as such in the dataset.
What changed.
Before
28.0 m³/day, with water flowing between runs and overnight
After
5.5 m³/day, on a schedule informed entirely by the data
$38,400
per year
Can Line Pasteurizer 2: 28.0 m³/day → 5.5 m³/day with no process changes.
Source: NB Power RFP 0770-25-S510 FINAL, Reference 3
In their words.
…unprecedented visibility…
Derek Cairney, Maintenance Reliability Specialist, Carlsberg Canada
Quoted verbatim from the archive. Where only a fragment is on file it renders as a fragment with its attribution; the middle is never invented.
Where to go next.
The sector, the sibling studies, and the calculator that runs this same arithmetic on your own numbers.
Predictive maintenanceWaterBreweries & Beverage
A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed
Carlsberg Canada
A failing diaphragm pump caught before it failed, and 540,000 L/day of loss prevented.
540,000 Lper day
Compressed airWaterFood & Beverage ProcessingBulk Handling & Rail Logistics
More than 450,000 litres saved in four months
PDI Bulk
PDI Bulk saved more than 450,000 litres of water in four months and produced a clear before-and-after view of compressor performance.
>450,000 Lin 4 months
WaterManufacturing: Automotive, Plastics & Rubber
Chiller circuit leak isolated without a shutdown
An automotive factory
Continuous monitoring helped identify and isolate a leaking cooling loop while the production line remained in operation.
1 loopisolated
Find out what’s hiding in your factory.
Every study on this site started with somebody walking a floor and asking what the numbers actually were. Our team will do the same on yours and tell you honestly what we find.
Book a site visitAll case studies
or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)
