Illustrative scenario

Conveyor-drive bearing degradation detected six weeks before failure

Illustrative scenario, representative of common industrial IoT applications

Predictive maintenanceBulk Handling & Rail LogisticsManufacturing: Automotive, Plastics & Rubber

The bearing’s vibration signature began changing approximately six weeks before the projected failure point.

A bulk handling facility

No client is named, no logo is shown and no figure here was measured at any site.

How it went.

Every study on this site runs the same four beats, in the same order.

  1. 01

    Alert

    A drive bearing on a main conveyor is a single point of failure for a whole line, and it gives very little audible warning.

  2. 02

    Cost

    6 weeks of warning. Between the first signature change and projected seizure.

  3. 03

    Fix

    Vibration and temperature sensor on the drive bearing · Runtime hours from the motor current · Trend alerting against the asset's own baseline

  4. 04

    Restored

    A planned Saturday bearing change

In full.

Illustrative scenario, representative of common industrial IoT applications.

The problem

A drive bearing on a main conveyor is a single point of failure for a whole line, and it gives very little audible warning.

What would be installed

  • Vibration and temperature sensor on the drive bearing
  • Runtime hours from the motor current
  • Trend alerting against the asset’s own baseline

What changes

Before: A line stoppage waiting to happen After: A planned Saturday bearing change

The number

6 weeks of warning. Between the first signature change and projected seizure. Illustrative scenario, not a client result. Figure is representative, not measured.

In one line

The same repair, done on a Saturday instead of in a crisis. That difference is worth more than the part.

What the data looked like.

Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.

Conveyor-drive bearing degradation detected six weeks before failure
BASELINE
BEARING VIBRATION · DRIVE AND NON-DRIVE END · 90 DAYS · DAILY
Chart data
IntervalDrive end (mm/s)Non-drive end (mm/s)
D11.861.79
D21.881.88
D31.981.81
D41.871.87
D51.931.72
D61.831.84
D71.941.73
D81.901.73
D91.841.79
D101.941.81
D111.931.77
D121.991.73
D131.941.84
D141.931.77
D151.841.80
D161.961.73
D171.891.86
D181.951.86
D191.911.80
D201.851.71
D211.891.82
D221.971.85
D231.861.80
D241.861.87
D251.821.76
D261.911.89
D271.881.89
D281.821.76
D291.941.85
D301.901.86
D311.941.80
D321.921.78
D331.961.71
D341.881.76
D351.951.86
D361.821.80
D371.971.81
D381.881.88
D391.921.75
D401.971.86
D411.901.79
D421.831.73
D431.891.85
D441.971.79
D451.971.73
D461.891.81
D471.871.86
D481.981.73
D491.871.85
D501.891.83
D511.811.80
D521.841.80
D531.891.87
D541.861.76
D551.861.81
D561.951.75
D572.011.82
D582.221.78
D592.321.72
D602.271.88
D612.361.76
D622.461.73
D632.601.79
D642.631.75
D652.831.80
D662.841.71
D673.001.86
D683.091.79
D693.241.76
D703.251.82
D713.411.79
D723.391.87
D733.521.78
D743.571.82
D753.781.74
D763.711.81
D773.841.87
D784.011.73
D794.031.87
D804.101.83
D814.281.81
D824.401.83
D834.421.77
D844.551.85
D854.551.85
D864.751.85
D874.821.87
D884.851.77
D894.921.75
D905.091.86
Before and after, in words
BeforeA line stoppage waiting to happen
AfterA planned Saturday bearing change

What changed.

Before

A line stoppage waiting to happen

After

A planned Saturday bearing change

6 weeks

of warning

Between the first signature change and projected seizure.

Source: Illustrative scenario, not a client result. Figure is representative, not measured.

Find out what’s hiding in your factory.

Every study on this site started with somebody walking a floor and asking what the numbers actually were. Our team will do the same on yours and tell you honestly what we find.

Book a site visitAll case studies

or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)